This Canon took the EOS 1300D, removed functionality and reduced it's build quality, and put a badge on it saying "4000D". The true replacement for the 1300D was the 2000D, which is a better camera. But the M50 and M50 Mk. II (which is, hardware-wise, just about the same as the original M50) are better choices. Ifyou are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon 4000D offers physical dimensions of 129mm x 102mm x 77mm (5.1" x 4.0" x 3.0") along with a weight of 436 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Nikon D3100 has measurements of 124mm x 96mm x 75mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") along with a hascontinuous autofocus when recording movies. Canon EOS 4000D. Canon Reben T3i. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. has a microphone input. Canon EOS 4000D. Canon Reben T3i. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack. Canon4000D vs Canon 600D Physical Comparison. When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon 4000D offers physical measurements of 129mm x 102mm x 77mm (5.1" x 4.0" x 3.0") and a weight of 436 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Canon 600D has measurements of 133mm x 100mm x WiFi 4 (802.11n) The Wi-Fi versions supported by the device. supports a remote smartphone. Canon EOS 4000D. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. This technology allows the users to use their smartphone as a remote control for the device. has an HDMI output. Canon EOS 4000D. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. Thewifi feature is pretty nice but on the other hand the 4000d comes with a digic4+ processor instead of the digic4 which should be a bit better but not yet cracked by the Magic Lantern guys. Although similarly priced, I went for the 5000 clicks used 600d. qcWGZJI.

canon 4000d vs 1300d which is better